So big is beautiful then? The unique selling point of most regional newspapers was about their affinity and closeness to the area.
They were small compact units with reporters, subs, advertising reps, and managing directors sitting in the heart of their communities.
But the survival package or new business model has changed.
It has been an extraordinary couple of weeks for Trinity Mirror, as it grows in size nationally while slicing its regional newsroom workforce.
TM bought Express Newspapers group for £127m, bringing into its stable the Daily Express, Star and magazines like OK!
Richard Desmond, who sold the Express gleefully told the Financial Times
that there were huge opportunities to save some £20m and increase revenues.
He added that it was all about scale ie being big, and instead of the advertising agencies stitching individual titles up over price for ads, they would get a better chance of turning a few more coins by being a monster.
Trinity Mirror’s chief executive Simon Fox was equally upbeat about the new clout they had acquired and the chance of being in a better place to negotiate with advertising agencies.
The theme of big is beautiful carried on over the shuffling of the pack and redundancies in the regions.
The news that the excellent newsman Rob Irvine had stepped down from the role of MEN editor was a surprise (well, it was for me).
I worked with Rob many moons ago in the Derby Telegraph newsroom, he was an excellent operator highlighted recently by the way he masterminded the coverage of the Manchester bomb attack last year.
He has also done wonders in growing the Holy Grail for TM, the online audience.
But with Rob leaving it opened up the whole of the north east to Hull Daily Mail editor Neil Hodgkinson, an equally excellent editor.
It was revealed that he would take control of the titles in the Newcastle with the Newcastle titles editor, Darren Thwaites, heading to Manchester.
So, hang on, the editor in charge of the Newcastle papers is actually based in Hull, just, 147.4 miles away, or two hours 34 minutes in the car, as long as there aren’t any roadworks on the A1(M), according to AA Route Planner.
Meanwhile, it was announced that the Tamworth Herald editor, the talented, hard-working Gary Phelps was also to step down.
As I finally finish this blog, news of who is going to be put at the helm of his newspapers has not been revealed.
Facetiously, I could say any editor within 147 miles of Tamworth, which would leave the field wide open, but I guess it will come under Birmingham Mail editor Marc Reeves who is at least not 147 miles away.
Does it matter where the editor resides? I think I may have opened a can of worms, so let’s move on…
I worked with Gary for a number of years. I had the unfortunate job to tell him his whole production department was moving to Stoke when the original Northcliffe subbing hubs were created back in 2009.
He took it on the chin and didn’t bear any grudges against me (or didn’t say it to my face) for dismantling his operation.
Perhaps he knew that one day production would return to Tamworth, which it did, a slimmer version than before, but nevertheless a victory for returning subbing back to its hometown roots.
In latter years, with fewer and fewer staff to put together the Tamworth Herald and its beast of a sister the Sutton Coldfield Observer, Gary has managed to hold it together.
So he will be a big loss to these publications.
So we have editors in charge of huge regions, we have websites disappearing, such as Burton being swallowed up by its big sister in Derby.
Then there’s the name changes to the online parts of the business as TM divorces the newspaper from the website.
As all of us who trod the boards in the newspaper business will remember, some of the most heated debates took place in those redesign of the paper meetings.
Thankfully, we employed a top-class referee, the brilliant editorial guru, Peter Sands.
There was always only one conclusion, never touch the design of the masthead, or at least keep its integrity. It’s the thing that identifies you and offers comfort to readers, a symbol of trust.
But in a blink of an eye, TM has ditched those names for its online offering, the decree absolute moment, separating print and online forever.
Should we be concerned about a name change?
Certainly, a site like The Sentinel in Stoke has had different titles on its journey such as thisisstaffordshire and latterly thesentinel.co.uk before its new reincarnation Stokeontrentlive, to go with BirminghamLive, BristolLive, DerbyshireLive and so on.
The unanswered question is whether readers go to the online sites of regional newspapers because they are a trusted brand with their traditional title or do they simply not care?
I would think that the generation who no longer read newspapers will not be bothered or understand the significance of whether the website was a Mail, Sentinel or Post, their trusted brand will become Live.
So, this is the old line in the sand moment. It splits print and the web and creates new boundaries with larger audiences and increases the advertising potential.
I have said before, that I firmly believed the web sites and their content should be separated from newspapers.
Over the last few years I have watched as those few print production journalists left have had to copy and paste off the web and squeeze that content into the newspaper.
In so many cases, the online content simply doesn’t match up to the requirements of print.
Online has so many variations when it comes to telling a story such as video, audio, slideshows and being able to aggregate social media via software such as Wakelet.
It has always been clear that the audience for print and online is different. My own little straw poll recently proved that.
I asked an audience at a lecture of the Leicester Literary and Philosophical Society if they still bought a newspaper, there was a forest of hands raised.
The following day I asked a group of students, not one twitch, no-one bought a newspaper.
This is the changing face of the media landscape. If TM or any other newspaper group are to secure their future, they cannot rely on print.
Similarly, newspapers cannot rely on online content. There is simply too much content which appears online which is not any good for newspapers.
Is this the brave new world then of the regional press? No-one likes to see job cuts, so many of us have felt the pain.
But, it’s all about preservation, so should we be thankful that still a lot of journalists are employed, despite there being fewer jobs?
The regional press has become like the punch-drunk boxer, wondering around trying to find away back into the fight.
Maybe, the re-shaping of the business will be the key. It’s another big gamble.
What it will achieve is a huge online audiences across the TM titles. This power will give it space to negotiate with advertisers while on the front foot.
As for print, the ability to run newspapers as standalone businesses is fine in principle, however, you need the staff to allow that to happen and it does look a bit thin on the ground.
Another move by a media giant to swallow up a minnow. Is it good for the newspaper business to have fewer owners? The argument again is, better to be big than not to be around at all…discuss.